Amen Joey, thank you for this post.  While I cannot speak for the creators of 
the amazing citizen science project that is eBird, I do not believe they 
intended the platform become a social media outlet which in some respects is 
the direction it has taken.  This is a tremendous resource of data, potentially 
a cornerstone of many bird conservation policies and actions, but it is just 
that, a database which is only as good as it’s data.  If I could wave a wand 
and eliminate the “Top 100s”, the various “Alerts”, and even inject a delay of 
weeks or months to when data posts to the public interface, I believe many of 
the unintended competitive consequences we’ve seen recently in birder behavior 
could be reduced and we can all get back to simply birding.

 

Full disclosure, I’ve been an eBird reviewer up in Wyoming for over 10 years 
and I can tell you first hand, the paucity of descriptive information provided 
by many users is striking.  The most important roll a reviewer can take is 
making sure the data housed on eBird’s servers is of as high a quality as 
possible at that time.  This means setting the filters that catch unusual 
sightings tight enough to reflect current understanding of populations, but 
loose enough to allow free flow of data when appropriate – this is a never 
ending evolutionary task.  And when a sighting gets flagged, rest assured it is 
in the system and will be reviewed at some point, but with review queues 
sometimes in the thousands it will take time.  If a sufficient description is 
provided, then the record will show up in the public data.  Remember your 
personal records will never change, and you can always access them via My eBird 
if you would like to look back and reflect.

 

So grab the binoculars, turn off the eBird app, and go find some of those 
Bohemian Waxwings that have showed up this year on your own, the rewards are 
far greater than simply chasing….then enter them into eBird in a week or two.  
If you’d like to get word out about your Bohemians beyond your friends, I hear 
this “COBirds” thing is a great communication tool.

 

Far more important than my two bits here is wishing you all a Happy Holiday, 
Merry Christmas, and a prosperous New Year filled with lots of good birds.

 

Cheers,

Doug Ward

Denver (currently in snowy Idaho)

 

PS –Bohemians are weirdly nearly absent up here in North Idaho this year 
(usually in flocks of hundreds), so they must have followed the cold air your 
direction, so good luck when you head out!!

 

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Joey 
Kellner
Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2022 6:00 AM
To: Colorado Birds <[email protected]>
Subject: [cobirds] Birding, eBird and eBird review(ers)

 

Time out everyone.  First of all, Happy Holidays to everyone!

We must have a LOT of newer birders in Colorado.  I say this because “back in 
the day”, we went birding for the fun of it and we called each other with our 
good bird sightings.  Sharing “our” good bird with others was enough 
“confirmation”, we did not need a “reviewer” to validate our birding abilities. 
 

Personally, when I find a bird that flags as rare, I document it such that an 
eBird reviewer (tomorrow, next year or next decade) will not need to contact 
me.  I attach photographs, sound recordings and/or write a detailed description 
OF THE BIRD (not that is flying, or that it is perched on a twig, but exactly 
what it looked like and how it might have differed from “the picture in the 
book”).  The description should be detailed enough that it stands the “test of 
time”.   A future researcher maybe 100 or 200 years from now (that has no idea 
what your birding skill-set was like) can also review your evidence and 
determine you saw what you said you saw.  Describe the bird and then eliminate 
similarly appearing species.  THEN, and here’s the MOST important part, DON’T 
LOOK BACK!   Move forward, get out for the joy and fun of birding, not because 
you NEED reassurance that you are a good birder or to see your name in 
“lights”, but because birding is FUN!  

As for the number of eBird reviewers, these are volunteers and finding people 
that have the historical background of Colorado (and county) birds, bird 
identification skills, a thick skin and WANT to do review is difficult.  In the 
past we’ve had reviewers that literally accepted just about EVERY bird 
(contrary to the evidence supplied)!   I (and likely eBird) would want 
reviewers that can scrutinize a record, make sure a more common species was not 
misidentified and ensure the data is as good as possible and that sometimes 
means not confirming some sightings.  Reviewers get burned out, some 
volunteering literally hundreds of hours a year doing eBird record and filter 
reviews.  Please don’t get mad at the people reviewing your records, it helps 
no one.  They get just as frustrated at us birders.  Birders that that don’t 
read the eBird rules and submit then 30-mile-long checklists, or create a 
checklist that follows a trail through three habitats in the course of 5 hours, 
or attach a photo to the wrong species.  It has GOT to be exhausting to be an 
eBird reviewer!  How many times have you said, “Thank you” to an eBird 
reviewer?  Then think how many times you’ve complained about them?  They are 
doing the best they can, trust me, I know many of them.  Better to just 
document the heck out of your rare bird, let the birding community know and 
move on to more birding fun!

Happy Holidays and I hope everyone can get out and see great birds in the new 
year!

Joey.

Joey Kellner

Littleton, Colorado

 

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Colorado Birds" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> 
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cobirds?hl=en?hl=en
* All posts should be signed with the poster's full name and city. Include bird 
species and location in the subject line when appropriate
* Join Colorado Field Ornithologists https://cobirds.org/CFO/Membership/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Colorado Birds" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> .
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cobirds/9890905d-5a6e-4a96-bba5-69ea1d27ab12n%40googlegroups.com
 
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cobirds/9890905d-5a6e-4a96-bba5-69ea1d27ab12n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
 .

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Colorado Birds" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cobirds?hl=en?hl=en
* All posts should be signed with the poster's full name and city. Include bird 
species and location in the subject line when appropriate
* Join Colorado Field Ornithologists https://cobirds.org/CFO/Membership/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Colorado Birds" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cobirds/006201d917c1%24041fa510%240c5eef30%24%40frontier.com.

Reply via email to