It would add completely new syntax for a very small problem.
I imagine that there is a need for the capability to specify not only meta-variables but also SmPL commands and configuration options in the "@@ block". SmPL rules can depend on information from previous selections. Can such "@@ blocks" contain specifications without a directly following patch/filter pattern?
Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci (Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only)
