> > +@depends on context && r1@ > > Will the use of a position variable be helpful here?
No. There is no need to repeat the same check for each place where a given type occurs. If the type always looks the same, checking it once is sufficient for all uses. > > + \(kmalloc\|kzalloc\|kcalloc\|kmem_cache_alloc\|kmem_cache_zalloc\| > > Did you consider to handle the relevant function names by a metavariable > instead of a SmPL disjunction? If you put the names into the constraints of a metavariable there will be no file filtering based on the function names and the semantic patch will run more slowly. julia _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
