+1 from here.
Vadim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sylvain Wallez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:08 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [C2]: Changes between C2.0 and C2.1
>
>
> +100 for LogKitManager. This is a major LogKit enhancement that is
> really useful in production environments. Thanks for it, Giacomo.
>
> +1 also for porting the Source interface changes, since they impact the
> core classes. IMO, it's better to have the same core in 2.0 and 2.1
> while 2.0 isn't final.
>
> Giacomo Pati wrote:
> > Quoting Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >
> >>>Giacomo Pati wrote:
> >>>
> >>>Quoting Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>>I am really impressed by the changes which took effect over the
> >>>>last weeks. Great work!
> >>>>
> >>>>But I am now wondering if we do the right thing. The C2.1 version
> >>>>is now incompatible to 2.0. So I fear, that people will never use
> >>>>the (final) 2.0 version and jump-start using 2.1 as they otherwise
> >>>>might have to change their source code first from C1 to C2.0 and
> >>>>afterwards to C2.1. And even if you start from scratch right now,
> >>>>you have to ask yourself if you want to give 2.1 first a try and
> >>>>only if things go wrong backup to 2.0.
> >>>>
> >>>Do you mean the LogKit Management? Well, it can be configured to
> >>>look like 2.0
> >>>logging behaviour, no problem. But then you will not see the
> >>>benefits of it.
> >>>
> >>>I wasn't able to follow closely the last few weeks and I don't
> >>>know what changes
> >>>you are mentioning.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>So did I....yes, the LogKit Management is one of it, I personally would
> >>like it in 2.0 as well.
> >>
> >
> > Well, we need a vote on this and I'll happily port it over then.
> >
> > Giacomo
> >
> >
> >>The other thing which comes to my mind is
> >>the Source interface changes, but there might be others as well.
> >>
> >>Carsten
> >>
> >>
> >>>Giacomo
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>I know that it was me who said we should finish 2.0 and make
> >>>>those changes only to 2.1, but after having two weeks vacation
> >>>>with much time to think about those issues, I found it worth
> >>>>to start this thread.
> >>>>
> >>>>Carsten
> >>>>
>
> --
> Sylvain Wallez
> Anyware Technologies - http://www.anyware-tech.com
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
