On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Ok, I'll port te LogKit management over to 2.0 this week.
Giacomo
> +1 from here.
>
> Vadim
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sylvain Wallez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:08 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [C2]: Changes between C2.0 and C2.1
> >
> >
> > +100 for LogKitManager. This is a major LogKit enhancement that is
> > really useful in production environments. Thanks for it, Giacomo.
> >
> > +1 also for porting the Source interface changes, since they impact the
> > core classes. IMO, it's better to have the same core in 2.0 and 2.1
> > while 2.0 isn't final.
> >
> > Giacomo Pati wrote:
> > > Quoting Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > >
> > >>>Giacomo Pati wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>Quoting Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>>Hi,
> > >>>>
> > >>>>I am really impressed by the changes which took effect over the
> > >>>>last weeks. Great work!
> > >>>>
> > >>>>But I am now wondering if we do the right thing. The C2.1 version
> > >>>>is now incompatible to 2.0. So I fear, that people will never use
> > >>>>the (final) 2.0 version and jump-start using 2.1 as they otherwise
> > >>>>might have to change their source code first from C1 to C2.0 and
> > >>>>afterwards to C2.1. And even if you start from scratch right now,
> > >>>>you have to ask yourself if you want to give 2.1 first a try and
> > >>>>only if things go wrong backup to 2.0.
> > >>>>
> > >>>Do you mean the LogKit Management? Well, it can be configured to
> > >>>look like 2.0
> > >>>logging behaviour, no problem. But then you will not see the
> > >>>benefits of it.
> > >>>
> > >>>I wasn't able to follow closely the last few weeks and I don't
> > >>>know what changes
> > >>>you are mentioning.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>So did I....yes, the LogKit Management is one of it, I personally would
> > >>like it in 2.0 as well.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Well, we need a vote on this and I'll happily port it over then.
> > >
> > > Giacomo
> > >
> > >
> > >>The other thing which comes to my mind is
> > >>the Source interface changes, but there might be others as well.
> > >>
> > >>Carsten
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>Giacomo
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>>I know that it was me who said we should finish 2.0 and make
> > >>>>those changes only to 2.1, but after having two weeks vacation
> > >>>>with much time to think about those issues, I found it worth
> > >>>>to start this thread.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>Carsten
> > >>>>
> >
> > --
> > Sylvain Wallez
> > Anyware Technologies - http://www.anyware-tech.com
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
