>is there any reason why the keys() method of the MRUStore is >not implemented? Laziness, forgetfulness :). Will be corrected. >The returned enumeration should contain all keys of the cache >and the underlying fs store, right? Can be very slow when there are many objects on the fs.... >In addition is the implementation if the containsKey() method >correct? It checks only against the memory cache but not >against the filesystem. The problem is, that to much fs I/O can react negative on the performance. Because of that containsKey() only checks the memory...But you're right this is in-consistent.
The current algorithm checks the fs in the get(..) method. Cheers Gerhard --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]