Whoops, that was quick! >> >is there any reason why the keys() method of the MRUStore is >> >not implemented? >> Laziness, forgetfulness :). Will be corrected. > >Great! >> >The returned enumeration should contain all keys of the cache >> >and the underlying fs store, right? >> Can be very slow when there are many objects on the fs.... >Indeed, but usually clients of the Store rarely need to call this >method and if they do it's their fault...But it should be implemented >regardless of performance issues. Ok, but I warned you :) > >> >In addition is the implementation if the containsKey() method >> >correct? It checks only against the memory cache but not >> >against the filesystem. >> The problem is, that to much fs I/O can react negative on the performance. >> Because of that containsKey() only checks the memory...But you're >> right this is in-consistent. >I would rather call it wrong ;) Will you please fix this, too? Wrong is such a evil word. Pedagogically not very useful ;). Ok joke, I will fix this next days!
Cheers Gerhard --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
