Quoting Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Giacomo Pati wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Team,
> > >
> > > I think it's time to think of a new release which should be
> > > a maintainance release. We have fixed some bugs, cleaned up
> > > parts of the docs etc.
> > >
> > > Now, what else should be done? I see currently two points:
> > >
> > > a) The changing of the directory structure according to the
> proposal.
> > >
> > > b) "Forgetting the 2.0 branch" to maintain only one CVS version.
> This
> > >    requires to move all experimental stuff into the scratchpad area.
> > >    We have to be sure to be compatible with 2.0!
> > >
> > > So what do you think about it? Perhaps a volunteer for a)?
> > 
> > I can do a) in the HEAD (I don't think we should do it in 2.0 branch)
> > 
> Great!
> I agree with you here, but we should then make a 2.0.1 release from
> the HEAD. So then we really do not need to worry about the 2.0 branch
> anymore.

As we have applied all the patches *also* to the 2.0 branch we can (for a 2.0.1 
release) build it from there and stick with HEAD afterwards (no more synching)

Giacomo

> 
> Carsten
> 
> > Giacomo
> > 
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Carsten
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to