> From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Giacomo Pati wrote: > > > > Quoting Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > Giacomo Pati wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Team, > > > > > > > > > > I think it's time to think of a new release which should be > > > > > a maintainance release. We have fixed some bugs, cleaned up > > > > > parts of the docs etc. > > > > > > > > > > Now, what else should be done? I see currently two points: > > > > > > > > > > a) The changing of the directory structure according to the > > > proposal. > > > > > > > > > > b) "Forgetting the 2.0 branch" to maintain only one CVS version. > > > This > > > > > requires to move all experimental stuff into the scratchpad area. > > > > > We have to be sure to be compatible with 2.0! > > > > > > > > > > So what do you think about it? Perhaps a volunteer for a)? > > > > > > > > I can do a) in the HEAD (I don't think we should do it in 2.0 branch) > > > > > > > Great! > > > I agree with you here, but we should then make a 2.0.1 release from > > > the HEAD. So then we really do not need to worry about the 2.0 branch > > > anymore. > > > > As we have applied all the patches *also* to the 2.0 branch we > > can (for a 2.0.1 > > release) build it from there and stick with HEAD afterwards (no > > more synching) > > > Hm, no I think that we then have the same situation as now. The HEAD and > the 2.0 branch differ in some points. Sooner or later we have to decide > what of the new functions in the HEAD should be in the next release > of Cocoon. > So I think we should move everything which is additional to the 2.0 branch > in the scratchpad area. There might be exceptions for this rule. > We can then directly make a 2.0.1 version from the HEAD and afterwards > move that parts from the scratchpad area back to the src which are > finished. > > If we first would do a 2.0.1 from the 2.0 branch, we still need to move > some parts of the HEAD in the scratchpad area. > > I feel that making a 2.0.1 from a "cleanup" HEAD is a little bit less work.
Agree with that. +1 for 2.0.1 from the HEAD. Vadim --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
