>-----Original Message----- >From: Vadim Gritsenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:48 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Planning the next release (was Re: patch politics) > > >> From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> >> Giacomo Pati wrote: >> > >> > Quoting Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > >> > > Giacomo Pati wrote: >> > > > >> > > > On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Hi Team, >> > > > > >> > > > > I think it's time to think of a new release which should be >> > > > > a maintainance release. We have fixed some bugs, cleaned up >> > > > > parts of the docs etc. >> > > > > >> > > > > Now, what else should be done? I see currently two points: >> > > > > >> > > > > a) The changing of the directory structure according to the >> > > proposal. >> > > > > >> > > > > b) "Forgetting the 2.0 branch" to maintain only one CVS >version. >> > > This >> > > > > requires to move all experimental stuff into the scratchpad >area. >> > > > > We have to be sure to be compatible with 2.0! >> > > > > >> > > > > So what do you think about it? Perhaps a volunteer for a)? >> > > > >> > > > I can do a) in the HEAD (I don't think we should do it in 2.0 >branch) >> > > > >> > > Great! >> > > I agree with you here, but we should then make a 2.0.1 release >from >> > > the HEAD. So then we really do not need to worry about the 2.0 >branch >> > > anymore. >> > >> > As we have applied all the patches *also* to the 2.0 branch we >> > can (for a 2.0.1 >> > release) build it from there and stick with HEAD afterwards (no >> > more synching) >> > >> Hm, no I think that we then have the same situation as now. The HEAD >and >> the 2.0 branch differ in some points. Sooner or later we have to >decide >> what of the new functions in the HEAD should be in the next release >> of Cocoon. >> So I think we should move everything which is additional to the 2.0 >branch >> in the scratchpad area. There might be exceptions for this rule. >> We can then directly make a 2.0.1 version from the HEAD and afterwards >> move that parts from the scratchpad area back to the src which are >> finished. >> >> If we first would do a 2.0.1 from the 2.0 branch, we still need to >move >> some parts of the HEAD in the scratchpad area. >> >> I feel that making a 2.0.1 from a "cleanup" HEAD is a little bit less >work. > >Agree with that. +1 for 2.0.1 from the HEAD. > >Vadim
+1 from me Gerhard "EARTH FIRST! We'll strip-mine the other planets later." --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
