----- Original Message ----- From: "Berin Loritsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 3:36 PM Subject: Re: Allowed Sitemap Constructs
> I see a Matcher kind of like a massive SELECT architecture.
Maybe repeating things already said but, now, is there a real semantic need
of matchers *and* selectors?
Couldn't
<map:match>
<map:match type="XX">
<map:generate>
<map:transform>
<map:serialize>
</map:match>
<map:match type="YY">
<map:generate>
<map:transform>
<map:serialize>
</map:match>
</map:match>
be used instead of
<map:match>
<map:select type="XX">
<map:when test="wap">
<map:generate>
<map:transform>
<map:serialize>
</map:when>
<map:when type="YY">
<map:generate>
<map:transform>
<map:serialize>
</map:when>
</map:select>
</map:match>
It seems that it's taken from the xsl:template and xsl:choose stuff.
But here there is no real semantic gain... or is there?
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
These are the days of miracle and wonder...
...so don't cry baby, don't cry...
Paul Simon
smime.p7s
Description: application/pkcs7-signature
