> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > From: "Berin Loritsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > I see a Matcher kind of like a massive SELECT architecture. > > Maybe repeating things already said but, now, is there a real semantic need > of matchers *and* selectors?
<snip> > It seems that it's taken from the xsl:template and xsl:choose stuff. > But here there is no real semantic gain... or is there? There is couple of differences between matchers and selectors: 1. Matchers do return map to the sitemap, selectors - don't. You can't emulate matchers using selector. 2. Selectors have <otherwise>, matchers - don't. And you can't emulate selector's <otherwise> using matchers. Vadim --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
