On Tue, 19 Mar 2002 13:48:49 +0000, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ovidiu Predescu wrote: > > Given that so many changes happened, should we name the release 2.1 > > instead? > > Simple question: have the APIs changed? If so, a minor version number > increase is a very good idea. If not, release manager's choice ;-) The TreeProcessor is a major addition in the current release. If we include it and document how to use it in the release, then in itself is a big enough change. Since it may affect existing applications, it's safer if we warn the users by using a different minor release number, than by increasing the subminor number, which is usually used to indicate bug fix releases. Greetings, -- Ovidiu Predescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Monitor/7464/ (GNU, Emacs, other stuff) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
