Ovidiu Predescu wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 19 Mar 2002 08:04:07 +0100, "Carsten Ziegeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > I totally forgot to remind you that we have a code freeze now.
> >
> > This means bug fixing, doc updates etc are of course still possible.
> >
> > If everything works well on monday I will do the 2.0.2 release then.
> 
> Given that so many changes happened, should we name the release 2.1
> instead?

Hmmm, don't know... it depends on how we want to consider version
numbers.

We could agree on having 

 major -> increased when back incompatible changes are done
 minor -> increased when new important functionality is added
 release -> increased on each bugfix release.

If we follow this scheme, Ovidiu is right and we should release 2.1,
what do others think?

-- 
Stefano Mazzocchi      One must still have chaos in oneself to be
                          able to give birth to a dancing star.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                             Friedrich Nietzsche
--------------------------------------------------------------------



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to