Ovidiu Predescu wrote: >On Tue, 19 Mar 2002 13:48:49 +0000, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Ovidiu Predescu wrote: >> >>>Given that so many changes happened, should we name the release 2.1 >>>instead? >>> >>Simple question: have the APIs changed? If so, a minor version number >>increase is a very good idea. If not, release manager's choice ;-) >> > >The TreeProcessor is a major addition in the current release. If we >include it and document how to use it in the release, then in itself >is a big enough change. Since it may affect existing applications, >it's safer if we warn the users by using a different minor release >number, than by increasing the subminor number, which is usually used >to indicate bug fix releases. > The TreeProcessor is now in the main trunk, but the compiled engine is still the default one. That's why a minor release number has been chosen.
Having the TreeProcessor in the release will allow people to use it and make sure it is rock-solid before becoming the default one. Release 2.0.2 may be the last one in the 2.0.x series : the next one is likely to have TreeProcessor as the default engine, and also a brand new flow engine. This will justify it to be 2.1 Sylvain -- Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies Apache Cocoon http://www.anyware-tech.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
