Diana, coming back on my previous statement....:
I think the problem of having one more mailinglist doesn't weigh in against the difficulties we are having right now with people of different interests talking about doco issues but not actually doing anything about it. If you want the freedom to let the docoproject stand on it's own, I can only support that idea. I'm restating my previous vote to +1 with inclusion of the suggestion John Morrison made, i.e. the cvs-list-like setup. Let the doco-project have it's own list since it won't survive yet another round of discussions as we previously had (gee, we almost seemed like the general@jakarta list ;-) My other reservation, i.e. doing the infrastructural work on Forrest, still stands as it is. Please let's crosspollinate and let Cocoon be the Forrest showcase. Given little time, I'll be happy to checkout todo-doc.xml and see where I can help. Let's keep this train rolling! Cheers, </Steven> > -----Original Message----- > From: Steven Noels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: maandag 6 mei 2002 20:11 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [vote] cocoon-docs > > > Diana, > > No voting rights on cocoon issues, but since I correspond on > Cocoon and > Forrest doco issues on this and the forrest-dev list, I think we have > enough lists already. So here goes my informal -1. > > What I would really like however is having the > infrastructural topics of > documentation issues to be held on Forrest, i.e. hyperlinking, > hierarchy/navigation, URI space management and DTD's. This > way, we will > discuss them in a broader scope than Cocoon alone. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
