Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> 
> Geoff Howard wrote:
> 
> >I like all that -- assume it would involve fairly invasive 
> restructuring of
> >the whole pipeline process, but need to go read up on the prior 
> discussion
> >you mention.
> >
> 
> This change will be fairly easy with event and stream pipelines merged 
> in a single class : it involves handling pipeline variations in a 
> ComponentSelector and adding a new "type" attribute on <map:pipeline> to 
> choose the pipeline type.
> 
> Carsten, what's the status of pipeline merging ? The classes are there, 
> but don't seem to be used right now. Can we switch to this new 
> implementation ?
> 
If we don't need caching, we can switch right now. The implementation
of the new caching pipeline is absolutely buggy and does not work at all.
I want to get it working by the end of the week.

Carsten


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to