Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > Geoff Howard wrote: > > >I like all that -- assume it would involve fairly invasive > restructuring of > >the whole pipeline process, but need to go read up on the prior > discussion > >you mention. > > > > This change will be fairly easy with event and stream pipelines merged > in a single class : it involves handling pipeline variations in a > ComponentSelector and adding a new "type" attribute on <map:pipeline> to > choose the pipeline type. > > Carsten, what's the status of pipeline merging ? The classes are there, > but don't seem to be used right now. Can we switch to this new > implementation ? > If we don't need caching, we can switch right now. The implementation of the new caching pipeline is absolutely buggy and does not work at all. I want to get it working by the end of the week.
Carsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
