Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Sylvain Wallez wrote: > >>Geoff Howard wrote: >> >> >>>I like all that -- assume it would involve fairly invasive >> >>restructuring of >> >>>the whole pipeline process, but need to go read up on the prior >> >>discussion >> >>>you mention. >>> >> >>This change will be fairly easy with event and stream pipelines merged >>in a single class : it involves handling pipeline variations in a >>ComponentSelector and adding a new "type" attribute on <map:pipeline> to >>choose the pipeline type. >> >>Carsten, what's the status of pipeline merging ? The classes are there, >>but don't seem to be used right now. Can we switch to this new >>implementation ? >> > > If we don't need caching, we can switch right now. The implementation > of the new caching pipeline is absolutely buggy and does not work at all. > I want to get it working by the end of the week.
Go for it :). Greets Gerhard -- ----------------------------------------------------- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. ----------------------------------------------------- Weblogging at: http://radio.weblogs.com/0107791/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
