> From: Stuart Roebuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> 
> My only concern here is that publications don't need to be checked 
> synchronously for general use, but they may need to be checked 
> synchronously as part of implementing a content management system for 
> people who are accessing the content immediately after a change.


If your CMS manually invalidated the entry for that resource when a
change is checked in, then your problem is solved.  The asynchronous
checking is more advantageous for filesystem resources and such.
The fact that the CMS checks things in using another thread, (as all
requests are in separate threads), gives the effect of asynchronous
management.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to