> From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > On Friday 07 June 2002 11:37, Jeremy Quinn wrote: > >. . . > > On Friday, June 7, 2002, at 06:12 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > >. . . > > > So a parallel wiki (or whatever) structure is the way to go > > > IMHO, but this > > > comes once again to the question of having a dynamic server for > > > the Cocoon web site... > > > > But do we? > > > > If we had something similar to BugZilla for documentation, that > > would accept emailed doc updates, then the work of the editor > > could take place on the servers set up by the users, and posted > > to the Doc BugZilla for checking and if appropriate, inclusion. > >. . . > > Great idea, as long as users are far enough in their Cocoon > installation to > have this doc comments system running. > > The only drag compared to a dynamic server is that users won't be > able to see > other user's comments until they are integrated in the docs.
We are not allowed to run a dynamic server. Unless somebody stumps up the hardware and the bandwidth required to run quite a high volume website I think this argument isn't resolvable atm :( Of cause - I've no objection to people writing the code so when we do have a dynamic site it all runs nicely... :) J. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
