Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
> >>> Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Oh god no...businesslogic in javascript.. . no no no. I'm having
> >>>> nightmares
> ...
>
> >> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> >>
> >>> Maybe, could you just help me come up with a business-logic stuff
> >>> that isn't written in sitemap or flowscript
> ...
>
> > Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
> >
> >> Yes. Lets put our heads together and think it through.
> ...
>
> Per-Olof Norén wrote:
>
> > I *totally* agree on the need for a non-compiling option to execute
> > business logic. Please do think loud on the list and I´ll help
> > thinking... :)
>
> Ok, let's start this really /proactive/ (I love this word, it just fills
> one's mouth ;-) RT about a business logic definition system that has
> these goals:
>
> 1. has a quick write-test-correct cycle, ie not to be compiled
> 2. is easy to write and understand
> 3. is modular
> 4. will make flowscript a solution to a problem, not a problem itself
>
> Definition
> ------------
>
> What the are business components-rules-whatever?
>
> A - definition(s)
> B - use cases
> C - actors involved
>
> ?
Please, stop.
Let's avoid the usual "let's tackle all problems at once" and let's try
to get something hammered down before starting using brain cycles in
some other directions.
There are yet many doubts to cover from the flowscript stuff that start
talking about something else makes less sense ATM, IMHO.
So, please, let's place this back on the stack.
Thank you.
--
Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be
able to give birth to a dancing star.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Friedrich Nietzsche
--------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
