Re: [RT] SpitScript - B-Logic that doesn't suck ( Re: [RT] Flowmaps)

[Nicola Ken Barozzi]

Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:

>>...they are not entirely separate since the business logic might also
>>influence the flow. There should be a good separation (SoC) but I think we
>>need to see the full picture. So I don't think it's totally useless to talk
>>about it right now - but we shouldn't mix it up...
> 
> 
> I'm wide open to suggestions on how you can *force* somebody to separate
> its flow logic from its business logic.

How can you *force* people to make COP?
Give them Avalon ;-)

Ok, there's more than a way to hang yourself, but let's make it harder.

That's why I'm asking myself what remains to be done after flowscript.
Without is, people were abusing the sitemap, because they needed a solution.
Now they will abuse flowscript, because they need another solution 
(business objects).

-- 
Nicola Ken Barozzi                   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
             - verba volant, scripta manent -
    (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]