Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:

> > Let's avoid the usual "let's tackle all problems at once" and let's try
> > to get something hammered down before starting using brain cycles in
> > some other directions.
> 
> This is actually part of the hammering down.
> I was talking about definitions (ie what flowscript isn't), not
> implementations...

Ok. Here's my vision: a flowscript is the location where you place your
flow logic. The flow logic is the collection of instructions that
indicate how to make the transition from one page to another.

Everything else shouldn't be there.

> > There are yet many doubts to cover from the flowscript stuff that start
> > talking about something else makes less sense ATM, IMHO.
> 
> This is one of them.
> Flowmaps are so powerfull that all the stuff that was innapropriate to
> be done in the sitemap (heavy webapps) will automatically slip over to
> flowmaps.
> And since it's procedural, it's a *big* concern of mine that flowscript
> will become the problem-solver catchall.

I hear you, but since we all agree that business logic shouldn't be in
the flowscript, I don't understand the need to discuss whether or not
it's good to have business logic defined in a scripting language.

This is an entirely separate concern.

> > So, please, let's place this back on the stack.
> 
> It's already on the stack underneath, this is part of the flowscript
> definition.

It's hard to define what a business logic is, but it's easy to know if
this has anything to do with describing the transition between pages
(flow).

> When you made the sitemap you also talked about what it *isn't*, not
> only what it *is*.
> Spitscript is what should stay out of the flowmap.

No, no, no. With this you are assuming that it's equivalent to use a
scripting language to describe business logic. This is yet to be
discussed, but this is an entirely different concern from this
discussion, thus my call to stop it until we have finished focusing on
the flowscript.

-- 
Stefano Mazzocchi      One must still have chaos in oneself to be
                          able to give birth to a dancing star.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                             Friedrich Nietzsche
--------------------------------------------------------------------


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to