On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Michael Wechner wrote:
> Hi
>
> After some discussions we decided
> that it's best to base Wyona's Content Management API on
> the Slide API.
>
> The have the following architecture in mind:
>
>
>
> +-----------------------------------------+
> | CLIENT |
> | (HTTP, WebDAV, Other) |
> +-----------------------------------------+
> /|\ /|\
> | |
> \|/ |
> +---------+---+ |
> | COCOON | | |
> | +-----+ | |
> | | WYONA | |
> +---+---------+ |
> /|\ /|\ |
> | | |
> | \|/ \|/
> | +-----------------+--------------+----+
> | | SLIDE |WebDAV Servlet| |
> | | (CM API) +--------------+ |
> | +-------------------------------------+
> | /|\
> | |
> \|/ \|/
> +-------------------------------------------+
> | DATA STORES |
> | |
> | +----------+ +----+ +------+ +-----+ |
> | |Filesystem| |JDBC| |XML:DB| |Other| |
> | +----------+ +----+ +------+ +-----+ |
> +-------------------------------------------+
Looks like the same architecture as we used at our project, except of the
wyona part ;-)
But this will only run one machine in this combination. If you want to
run this in a cluster, you will have problems with the caching of the
Slide Stores. These problems are solveable, but you must think about it.
My 2 cents, Stephan Michels.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
