Stephan Michels wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Michael Wechner wrote:
>
>
>>Hi
>>
>>After some discussions we decided
>>that it's best to base Wyona's Content Management API on
>>the Slide API.
>>
>>The have the following architecture in mind:
>>
>>
>>
>>+-----------------------------------------+
>>| CLIENT |
>>| (HTTP, WebDAV, Other) |
>>+-----------------------------------------+
>> /|\ /|\
>> | |
>> \|/ |
>>+---------+---+ |
>>| COCOON | | |
>>| +-----+ | |
>>| | WYONA | |
>>+---+---------+ |
>> /|\ /|\ |
>> | | |
>> | \|/ \|/
>> | +-----------------+--------------+----+
>> | | SLIDE |WebDAV Servlet| |
>> | | (CM API) +--------------+ |
>> | +-------------------------------------+
>> | /|\
>> | |
>> \|/ \|/
>>+-------------------------------------------+
>>| DATA STORES |
>>| |
>>| +----------+ +----+ +------+ +-----+ |
>>| |Filesystem| |JDBC| |XML:DB| |Other| |
>>| +----------+ +----+ +------+ +-----+ |
>>+-------------------------------------------+
>>
>
> Looks like the same architecture as we used at our project, except of the
> wyona part ;-)
Do you have more information on your project available?
>
> But this will only run one machine in this combination. If you want to
> run this in a cluster, you will have problems with the caching of the
> Slide Stores.
What kind of cluster do you have in mind?
> These problems are solveable, but you must think about it.
Good to know
Thanks
Michael
>
> My 2 cents, Stephan Michels.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
