what might be interesting is comparing the number of links to each site: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&q=link:http%3A%2F%2Fxml%2Eapache%2Eorg%2Fcocoon%2F
2,660 links to http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/ http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&q=link:http%3A%2F%2Fjakarta%2Eapache%2Eorg%2Fstruts%2F 1,460 links to http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/ http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&q=link:http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Ezope%2Eorg%2F 20,300 links to http://www.zope.org/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 10:31 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [OT] Googlefight > > > Quoting Piroumian Konstantin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Another comparison: Cocoon vs. Struts. > > > > > http://www.googlefight.com/cgi-bin/compare.pl?q1=Cocoon&q2=Str > uts&B1=I%27m+F > > eeling+Groggy%21%21+Go%21&compare=1&langue=us > > > > Result could seem amazing, knowing how popular is Struts. > But after a moment > > I've realized that so few searches can also indicate more > visibility of the > > project (I mean that Struts does not need to be searched, > cause it's well > > known). So returning to the Cocoon vs. Zope case, if Cocoon > is searched less > > than Zope this can mean also that Cocoon is easier to find > by other means > > (e.g. directly from Apache site). > > Hmmm, while I was craching up to see that googlefight web > (isn't human > creativity so amazing sometimes?), with my semantic hat on > and with purity mode > turned on, I would say that the above is purely and > absolutely useless. > > look at > > http://www.cocoon1.com > > and you know what I mean :) > > In a really semantic search engine, we would have our own URI > point to our own > topic and we could be able to have a fair > semantic-searchfight... but that > would mean that, for example, the search engine should be > inferring smart > enough to understand that if I talk about 'cocoon' on the 'cocoon- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]' mail list, than that token should be > associated with the > topic related to http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/ > > Yeah, it would be cool, but totally impractical since you'd > have to write your > emails using RDF-like markup. > > Bah, I should burn this stupid semantic hat one day. > > -- > Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
