Amir Rosen wrote: >what might be interesting is comparing the number of links to each site: > >http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&q=link:http%3A%2F%2Fxml%2Eapache%2Eorg%2Fcocoon%2F > >2,660 links to http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/ > >http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&q=link:http%3A%2F%2Fjakarta%2Eapache%2Eorg%2Fstruts%2F > >1,460 links to http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/ > >http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&q=link:http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Ezope%2Eorg%2F > >20,300 links to http://www.zope.org/ >
... and in reality it is only 1000 links: http://www.google.com/search?q=link:http://www.zope.org/&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&start=990&sa=N&filter=0 Vadim >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 10:31 AM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: RE: [OT] Googlefight >> >> >>Quoting Piroumian Konstantin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> >> >>>Another comparison: Cocoon vs. Struts. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>http://www.googlefight.com/cgi-bin/compare.pl?q1=Cocoon&q2=Str >>uts&B1=I%27m+F >> >> >>>eeling+Groggy%21%21+Go%21&compare=1&langue=us >>> >>>Result could seem amazing, knowing how popular is Struts. >>> >>> >>But after a moment >> >> >>>I've realized that so few searches can also indicate more >>> >>> >>visibility of the >> >> >>>project (I mean that Struts does not need to be searched, >>> >>> >>cause it's well >> >> >>>known). So returning to the Cocoon vs. Zope case, if Cocoon >>> >>> >>is searched less >> >> >>>than Zope this can mean also that Cocoon is easier to find >>> >>> >>by other means >> >> >>>(e.g. directly from Apache site). >>> >>> >>Hmmm, while I was craching up to see that googlefight web >>(isn't human >>creativity so amazing sometimes?), with my semantic hat on >>and with purity mode >>turned on, I would say that the above is purely and >>absolutely useless. >> >>look at >> >> http://www.cocoon1.com >> >>and you know what I mean :) >> >>In a really semantic search engine, we would have our own URI >>point to our own >>topic and we could be able to have a fair >>semantic-searchfight... but that >>would mean that, for example, the search engine should be >>inferring smart >>enough to understand that if I talk about 'cocoon' on the 'cocoon- >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]' mail list, than that token should be >>associated with the >>topic related to http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/ >> >>Yeah, it would be cool, but totally impractical since you'd >>have to write your >>emails using RDF-like markup. >> >>Bah, I should burn this stupid semantic hat one day. >> >>-- >>Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
