> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vadim Gritsenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 5:02 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OT] Googlefight
>
>
> Amir Rosen wrote:
>
> >what might be interesting is comparing the number of links
> to each site:
> >
> >http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&q=link:http%3
> A%2F%2Fxml%2Eapache%2Eorg%2Fcocoon%2F
> >
> >2,660 links to http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/
> >
> >http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&q=link:http%3
> A%2F%2Fjakarta%2Eapache%2Eorg%2Fstruts%2F
> >
> >1,460 links to http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/
> >
> >http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&q=link:http%3
> A%2F%2Fwww%2Ezope%2Eorg%2F
> >
> >20,300 links to http://www.zope.org/
> >
>
> ... and in reality it is only 1000 links:
>
> http://www.google.com/search?q=link:http://www.zope.org/&hl=en
> &lr=&ie=UTF-8&start=990&sa=N&filter=0
>
> Vadim
>
Seems like a google bug
http://www.google.com/search?q=xml&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&start=990&sa=N&filter=0
Amir
>
>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 10:31 AM
> >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Subject: RE: [OT] Googlefight
> >>
> >>
> >>Quoting Piroumian Konstantin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Another comparison: Cocoon vs. Struts.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>http://www.googlefight.com/cgi-bin/compare.pl?q1=Cocoon&q2=Str
> >>uts&B1=I%27m+F
> >>
> >>
> >>>eeling+Groggy%21%21+Go%21&compare=1&langue=us
> >>>
> >>>Result could seem amazing, knowing how popular is Struts.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>But after a moment
> >>
> >>
> >>>I've realized that so few searches can also indicate more
> >>>
> >>>
> >>visibility of the
> >>
> >>
> >>>project (I mean that Struts does not need to be searched,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>cause it's well
> >>
> >>
> >>>known). So returning to the Cocoon vs. Zope case, if Cocoon
> >>>
> >>>
> >>is searched less
> >>
> >>
> >>>than Zope this can mean also that Cocoon is easier to find
> >>>
> >>>
> >>by other means
> >>
> >>
> >>>(e.g. directly from Apache site).
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Hmmm, while I was craching up to see that googlefight web
> >>(isn't human
> >>creativity so amazing sometimes?), with my semantic hat on
> >>and with purity mode
> >>turned on, I would say that the above is purely and
> >>absolutely useless.
> >>
> >>look at
> >>
> >> http://www.cocoon1.com
> >>
> >>and you know what I mean :)
> >>
> >>In a really semantic search engine, we would have our own URI
> >>point to our own
> >>topic and we could be able to have a fair
> >>semantic-searchfight... but that
> >>would mean that, for example, the search engine should be
> >>inferring smart
> >>enough to understand that if I talk about 'cocoon' on the 'cocoon-
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]' mail list, than that token should be
> >>associated with the
> >>topic related to http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/
> >>
> >>Yeah, it would be cool, but totally impractical since you'd
> >>have to write your
> >>emails using RDF-like markup.
> >>
> >>Bah, I should burn this stupid semantic hat one day.
> >>
> >>--
> >>Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
