Diana Shannon wrote: > > David Crossley wrote: > > > I wonder if it would be even better to just expand the main list > > so that each item became a section heading with manual numbering. > > Good idea. Ok, I did this for the first three issues, adding lines in > between for some clarity. I think it's a lot better with all of our > ideas now combined... > > If you agree, I'll modify the rest in a similar fashion.
Yes please do. This is good evolution. > I think we also need to rewrite the page into a proposal (on its own > page), e.g. This first step was to gather the issues. I am not sure if we are finished with that yet. We may be able to dispense with some, and perhaps there are others that we have missed. I was expecting the list of issues/requirements to evolve into an actual proposal. > What-Why-When-Where-How, that is > - What > Describe what Forrest is > - Why > Describe benefits of transition > - When > Propose a schedule > - Where > Describe how it will impact the cvs (or not), e.g. give options > - How > Describe the steps involved and their implications/outstanding issues I wonder how much effort that we need to go to at this stage. The details of the procedure (How and impacts) could come later. Our first goal is to get a basic proposal happening and vote on that. The vote then brings us more people to help with working out the details. --David
