Diana Shannon wrote: <snip/> > What I discovered in the process was item 8 (which I had > accidentally merged with item 7 on a previous edit): > > > 8. The documents that are published by Forrest need to > > be subsequently checked-in to the xml-site CVS. > > Do you mean the live site cvs? Do we **really** have to do this? > Goodness, I thought Forrest automation would eliminate this step. > Why is it still needed?
Good point. However, this was an "issue" gleaned from some email [1], that cvs history had to be maintained for xml-site/targets/*.html Another reason was that the current publishing mechanism. is an automated cron job that just copies the content of xml-site/targets/cocoon/ to xml.apache.org [1] See Ken email linked from wiki to: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=forrest-dev&m=103649129528547 --David
