On Sunday, November 24, 2002, at 03:36 AM, David Crossley wrote:
Good idea. Ok, I did this for the first three issues, adding lines in between for some clarity. I think it's a lot better with all of our ideas now combined...
If you agree, I'll modify the rest in a similar fashion.
Yes please do. This is good evolution.
Ok, I did this.
What I discovered in the process was item 8 (which I had accidentally merged with item 7 on a previous edit):
8. The documents that are published by Forrest need to be subsequently checked-in to the xml-site CVS.
Do you mean the live site cvs? Do we **really** have to do this? Goodness, I thought Forrest automation would eliminate this step. Why is it still needed?
Diana
P.S. I'm unplugged for a few days for the US Thankgiving holiday.
