Moving to a DVCS is a definite plus. The compelling migration targets seems to be hg + Bitbucket or git + Github
git + Github is workable, and I'm more familiarized with Github Richard, do you have a strong opinion on this matter ? claudio -- On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Michał Jaworski <[email protected]>wrote: > I thought that cocos2d was dead but today I got surprised by new release. > Great work done! It's nice to see that there is some progress but it's sad > that there was more than a year of silence between releases. Don't you all > think that cocos2d development could be faster? > I think that there is a lot of developers that would like to contribute to > cocos2d but they simply don't because now contributing is a huge pain in > the ass. Maybe this project could benefit from migrating to GitHub? Here > are main benefit's I see: > - people could contribute by simply forking project and making pull > requests instead of sending patches/diffs. Pull requests are easier to > review and test - PRs can be tested automatically with travis. > - git instead of subversion > - way better issue tracker > - free continuous integration with Travis > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "cocos2d discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cocos-discuss. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cocos2d discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cocos-discuss. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
