I vote (heh) for "d" which will look a lot like "c" anyway, but with smatterings of owl:sameAs and Range-14 style 303's to keep things interesting. :)

P: 864.232.9553
W: http://www.bigbluehat.com/

On 4/29/10 2:01 PM, Jakob Voss wrote:
How about a bet instead of voting. In three years will there be:

a) No relevant Twitter annotations anyway
b) Twitter annotations but not used much for bibliographic data
c) A rich variety of incompatible bibliographic annotation standards
d) Semantic Web will have solved every problem anyway

Reply via email to