I think he should match this against the access level off the person who is banned.
For exemple: You have level 200, I have level 300. Should you be able to ban me @ level 74? I feel that whenever that happens X should unban any ban in his internal list if the level off the user who entered the ban, is lower then the level off the user who is login in. It's not logic that you should need to unban yourself first cause someone with lower access banned you. Is that a correct statement? regards ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Real Name: Dimitri Logie IRC Name: éL NìçóS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Company: Systray Solutions URL: http://www.systray.be Contact: #Systray @ Krey.Net ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hidden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "C-C people" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 6:18 PM Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] bug with BAN cmd (level 74-) NicoS, it could maybe explain why, but it's still not normal that X lets USP get ops to then deop it cause it isnt allowed to be opped. I think the code should be modified so X checks if theres a ban (lower than 75) matching the nick!user@host of the one requesting ops when X receives the /msg X op #chan [nick]. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. Hidden ----- Original Message ----- From: "éL NìçoS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Hidden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Undernet Coder Committee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 6:15 AM Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] bug with BAN cmd (level 74-) > I might be mistaken, but I think this has something to do with the bot's > own level. > > If I would have 400 access for exemple, I would be able to suspend someone > with 200 access, but not someone with 450. If I would wanna ban the host of > someone who has 450 access, X would normally execute this ban, since he > matches against handles, not against hosts. So X would op that person since > he is not suspended, and the banlevel is lower then his access, and would > deop him since the level 74 doesn't allow that user to be opped. > > Could this be an explenation? > > regards > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Real Name: Dimitri Logie > IRC Name: éL NìçóS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Company: Systray Solutions > URL: http://www.systray.be > Contact: #Systray @ Krey.Net > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Hidden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 5:50 AM > Subject: [Coder-Com] bug with BAN cmd (level 74-) > > > People on this list, > > Here's the problem: > > [23:43] -> *[EMAIL PROTECTED]* ban #chan *usp*!*@* 24 74 uh > [23:43] *** X sets mode: -oo USP USPDB > [23:43] -X- Added ban *usp*!*@* to #chan at level 74 > [23:44] <Hidden> [23:43] -X- Added ban *usp*!*@* to #chan at level 74 > [23:44] *** X sets mode: +o USP > [23:44] *** X sets mode: -o USP > [23:45] *** X sets mode: +o USP > [23:45] *** X sets mode: -o USP > > [23:49] -> *[EMAIL PROTECTED]* lbanlist #usp_info * > [23:49] -X- *** Ban List for channel #chan *** > [23:49] -X- #usp_info *usp*!*@* Level: 74 > [23:49] -X- ADDED BY: Hidden (uh) > [23:49] -X- SINCE: Fri Aug 9 05:44:31 2002 > [23:49] -X- EXP: 0 days, 23:54:33 > [23:49] -X- *** END *** > > Jus thought I should let you know > > > Hidden > > > >
