> >The UNIX-based clients I've seen use : as field separators in server > >specifications, i.e., server.name:port:password:other-fields--and > >yes, I believe some use "other-fields". Thus, ':' is not the best > >choice for a field separator here :) > > That doesn't rule out using the password string to accomplish this. > Hell, user@password in the password field would work fine..
>From the looks of things, we're in violent agreement here except over a couple of the details. *shrug* -- Kevin L. Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>