> >The UNIX-based clients I've seen use : as field separators in server
> >specifications, i.e., server.name:port:password:other-fields--and
> >yes, I believe some use "other-fields".  Thus, ':' is not the best
> >choice for a field separator here :)
> 
> That doesn't rule out using the password string to accomplish this.
> Hell, user@password in the password field would work fine..

>From the looks of things, we're in violent agreement here except over
a couple of the details.  *shrug*
-- 
Kevin L. Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to