On 11/4/05, Dave Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think we'll have to do voting on this one... there a pros/cons to > either approach (use Spring DTD or make our own)
I'm torn. A big part of me would like to see us remain Spring-compatible and therefore use their DTD unchanged (referring to it directly on their site). That means that all the material out there about Spring can be used as-is by CFers and we'd be talking the same language as the Java developers - something that I've railed on the CF community for not doing in the past! OTOH, there are likely idiomatic differences between Java and CF that ColdSpring could leverage to its advantage which might mean a change in grammar. Overall tho', I'd need to see a lot of evidence in favor of forking before I voted for a separate DTD. -- Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/ Got frameworks? "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood
