As I tried to articulate earlier I hold the same view as Chris. I think only minor, minor changes should be necessary. :)
--Kurt On 11/7/05, Chris Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think we need to be open to making changes if they become > necessary, but right now, I don't think they are. I for one really > don't like the idea of changing bean to component. Everything is > working well today. I thin we should sit tight, and maybe take a look > at the one issue that 's been brought up with the name attribute for > constructor-arg. > > On Nov 7, 2005, at 3:08 PM, Adrocknaphobia wrote: > > > IMO (for what its worth), stick as close to the original java DTD and > > only make additions to it if necessary. ie. Don't change bean to > > component. Try not to make any changes, just additions. > > > > -Adam > > > > On 11/7/05, Dave Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>> I'm torn. A big part of me would like to see us remain > >>> Spring-compatible and therefore use their DTD unchanged > >>> (referring to > >>> it directly on their site). That means that all the material out > >>> there > >>> about Spring can be used as-is by CFers and we'd be talking the same > >>> language as the Java developers - something that I've railed on > >>> the CF > >>> community for not doing in the past! > >>> > >> > >> This is how I feel too, but... > >> > >> > >>> > >>> OTOH, there are likely idiomatic differences between Java and CF > >>> that > >>> ColdSpring could leverage to its advantage which might mean a change > >>> in grammar. > >>> > >>> > >> > >> Exactly, and looking at the .NET port of Spring, they have their own > >> XSD; they don't even use <bean />, they use <object />... So maybe on > >> our own is the way to go (but it opens up a whole new can of worms... > >> do we change <bean /> to <component />, etc etc? ) > >> > >> > >>> Overall tho', I'd need to see a lot of evidence in favor of forking > >>> before I voted for a separate DTD. > >>> > >> > >> Me too, I'd like to stick with the Java version for now because it > >> gave us a great starting point. Regardless, if anyone else has input, > >> I'd love to hear it... > >> > >> -Dave > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > >
