Hi again, On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 09:33:23PM +0100, Schmurfy wrote: > > I'd go for a variant of the first option: Simply do a normal check for > > the library using autoconf and link with libtool. > > > I will certainly need your help on this ;)
no problem ;) While I still don't particularly *like* autoconf, I at least learned to work with it. I'll look into it as soon as I find some time for it. > > I'd like a comment on the (apparently common) "other languages should be > > statically linked" misconception: […] > > > As far as i am am concerned it was more a thought than a deeply > anchored misconception ^^ Sorry, I think I got carried away there … I worked with another project for a while and those guys insisted on pulling in the sources of their tiny language (Squirrel in that case). > I just wish to find a way that makes the installation painless for > users. In my experience that's synonymous to "make the package maintainer happy" ;) Best regards, —octo -- Florian octo Forster Hacker in training GnuPG: 0x0C705A15 http://octo.it/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ collectd mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.verplant.org/listinfo/collectd
