.................................
To leave Commie, hyper to
http://commie.oy.com/commie_leaving.html
.................................
Welllllll...
let's put it like this:
I would like to have (at least) three computers:
1 Apple G4 for kick-ass GFX and SFX-processing with nice, configgable GUI
[configgable? what a word] and a widescreen TFT thrown in the mix
2 A UNIX machine for all the networking I'd like to do, as well as
scripting: hooks to every program, with nice CLI and input output (have
been looking for a 'normal' CLI Telnet for windows... didn't work out)
3 An absolutelyX-all enabled, ActiveX,DirectX,3DFX,MicrosoftX blazing Intel
machine with our beloved Windows installed (yeah..)
And maybe throw in a Linux proxy (sorry, guys, lame joke)
diskonext
At 11:43 AM 10/17/00 +0300, you wrote:
>.................................
>To leave Commie, hyper to
>http://commie.oy.com/commie_leaving.html
>.................................
>
>On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Jarmo Lundgren wrote:
>
>> I'm the last guy to argue that Mac would be superiour
>> _technically_... Multitasking is poor, networking is poor... But the
>> user interface rules. If I'd want technical superiority, I'd use some
>> UNIX variant or BeOS - not Windows, which doesn't follow any
>> standards.
>
>wow! it must've taken an our to write that down! ;) anyway, mac gui
>usability is something that hasn't been yet seen anywhere else. as i've
>stated previously, somewhere, approximately like this "mac gui was
>planned, and tested, whereas windoze gui was just thrown together"
>
>
>% killall -w -KILL bad_interface_design
>bad_interface_design: no process killed
>
>damn. they are too quick! they are polymorphic!
>
>/> sakke
>--
>work > http://www.teraflops.com/
>personal > http://www.vip.fi/~sakke/
>
>
>
