[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACE-316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13630194#comment-13630194
 ] 

Marcel Offermans commented on ACE-316:
--------------------------------------

I'm fine with recognizing only a finite set of artifact types that were 
actually plugged into the OBR. If something's not recognized, it won't show up 
in the repository. I think we should also consider types that have no support 
for versioning at all.

However, all of this is probably a bit beyond the scope of this particular 
issue. :)
                
> Layout the OBR filesystem differently.
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACE-316
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACE-316
>             Project: ACE
>          Issue Type: Question
>          Components: OBR
>            Reporter: Marcel Offermans
>            Assignee: Bram de Kruijff
>
> Currently, the OBR uses a single folder to store all artifacts. That does not 
> scale too well as OS specific directory limits might interfere. We should 
> implement a more hierarchical storage format, such as: <BSN>/<version> or 
> even one where each part of the BSN becomes a folder.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to