SamWheating commented on a change in pull request #17121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17121#discussion_r705882789



##########
File path: airflow/dag_processing/processor.py
##########
@@ -645,3 +648,12 @@ def process_file(
             self.log.exception("Error logging import errors!")
 
         return len(dagbag.dags), len(dagbag.import_errors)
+
+    def _deactivate_missing_dags(self, session: Session, dagbag: DagBag, 
file_path: str) -> None:
+        deactivated = (
+            session.query(DagModel)
+            .filter(DagModel.fileloc == file_path, DagModel.is_active, 
~DagModel.dag_id.in_(dagbag.dag_ids))
+            .update({DagModel.is_active: False}, synchronize_session="fetch")
+        )
+        if deactivated:
+            self.log.info("Deactivated %i DAGs which are no longer present in 
%s", deactivated, file_path)

Review comment:
       > I am touching same code, to do something similar (though not same at 
#18120)
   
   Interesting, I'll follow along with the conversation there as I think that 
there's some functional overlap with this PR, so a lot of the discussion is 
probably relevant here also.
   
   There's also another PR recently open which takes a different approach to 
the same problem as this PR (https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18087) We 
should definitely compare the different approaches and agree upon the best way 
to fix this issue. 




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to