potiuk commented on PR #761:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/761#issuecomment-1496593374

   That's an interesting idea @mik-laj :) . It's not exactly why canonical was 
created for, but it might do it in our case. However this is significantly more 
complex to implement because not only we would have to post-process historical 
pages and add "canonical" link, but we would have to continuously update old 
pages as they get older - note that "stable" is a symbolic link to the last 
version, so in effect the stable links would refer to themselves,
   
   This on it's own is not a bad practice - it seems to be even recommended 
https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-self-referencing-canonicals-are-not-critical/312619/
  but then we either post-process the docs when some new version is released or 
we are limiting ourselves strictly to only indexing the very last patchleve 
version for airflow or providers.
   
   IMHO - If we choose to only index the last patchlevel - then using canonical 
makes sense. If we choose another scheme, this is a lot of hassle.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to