jedcunningham commented on PR #30569:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/30569#issuecomment-1503999213

   I'm generally on board with this. I think as long as the license is in the 
source file, we are okay. I don't see anything that states anything generated 
from it also requires it. That's how I read it though. @potiuk?
   
   If not, we could switch to the [short 
form](https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#is-a-short-form-of-the-source-header-available)
 instead. Perfectly justified in this case!


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to