potiuk commented on PR #30569:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/30569#issuecomment-1504072623
> I'm generally on board with this. I think as long as the license is in the
source file, we are okay. I don't see anything that states anything generated
from it also requires it. That's how I read it though. @potiuk?
Yeah. I think it's totally transparent except being annoying while debuging.
> If not, we could switch to the [short
form](https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#is-a-short-form-of-the-source-header-available)
instead. Perfectly justified in this case!
I'd rather keep the long form if it is not problematic (seems that we have
good solution that makes it possible). There is a good reason why we have to
add it and while it is generally a boilerplate, until the OSS world (and the
ASF in general) will settle down on say - using SPDX headers by default, this
is a necessary boierplate. I might not like it, but it feels right to add whole
licence text there (IANAL of course).
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
