uranusjr commented on code in PR #33720:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/33720#discussion_r1306999984
##########
airflow/models/taskreschedule.py:
##########
@@ -142,9 +154,93 @@ def find_for_task_instance(
:param try_number: Look for TaskReschedule of the given try_number.
Default is None which
looks for the same try_number of the given task_instance.
"""
- return TaskReschedule.query_for_task_instance(
- task_instance, session=session, try_number=try_number
- ).all()
+ return session.scalars(cls.stmt_for_task_instance(task_instance,
try_number=try_number)).all()
+
+ @classmethod
+ @provide_session
+ def find_last_for_task_instance(
Review Comment:
I wonder if we really need this method at all. The logic is rather simple
and does not really provide any encapsulation benefits. (Same for
`find_for_task_instance` above but it’s already there so there’s probably an
argument for keeping it.)
##########
airflow/models/taskreschedule.py:
##########
@@ -142,9 +154,93 @@ def find_for_task_instance(
:param try_number: Look for TaskReschedule of the given try_number.
Default is None which
looks for the same try_number of the given task_instance.
"""
- return TaskReschedule.query_for_task_instance(
- task_instance, session=session, try_number=try_number
- ).all()
+ return session.scalars(cls.stmt_for_task_instance(task_instance,
try_number=try_number)).all()
+
+ @classmethod
+ @provide_session
+ def find_last_for_task_instance(
Review Comment:
I wonder if we really need this method at all. The logic is rather simple
and does not really provide any encapsulation benefits. (Same for
`find_for_task_instance` above but it’s already there so there’s probably an
argument for keeping it.)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
