o-nikolas commented on code in PR #38514:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/38514#discussion_r1552549164
##########
airflow/jobs/scheduler_job_runner.py:
##########
@@ -270,8 +270,10 @@ def _debug_dump(self, signum: int, frame: FrameType |
None) -> None:
self.log.info("%s\n%s received, printing debug\n%s", "-" * 80,
sig_name, "-" * 80)
- self.job.executor.debug_dump()
- self.log.info("-" * 80)
+ for executor in self.job.executors:
+ self.log.info("Debug dump for the executor %s", executor)
+ executor.debug_dump()
+ self.log.info("-" * 80)
Review Comment:
Yupp, again, I don't disagree! I just don't think this PR is the right place
for that migration. I'd like these to really just be a porting of existing
behaviour to multi executor, rather than intertwining them with new initiatives
or other functional changes.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
