potiuk commented on PR #43902: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/43902#issuecomment-2470118445
> Providers don’t generally use `execution_date`; in the rare cases they do, a compatibility layer is provided so they work on both Airflow 2 and 3. No official providers have interface that expose `execution_date` to the user. Yeah. I think we need to bite the bullet and change it - even if we know that **some** things outside of our providers will be broken. Our compat tests are passing, which means that the change is "good to go" from our provider's point of view, but we should add this change to be listed in https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41641 so that we remember there is a 2 to 3 migration rule that will check if exection_date is still not used somewhwere in the user code when they are attempting to migrate. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
