Dev-iL commented on PR #60270: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/60270#issuecomment-3730327517
> But I see that as the best long-term option. How does this sound for now: - [x] Update the PR's description with an architectural note. - [ ] Add a follow-up parent issue to discuss the need and possible approaches for a long term solution, and track its implementation. - [ ] Add the following to the docs in this PR: ```md ### Using DAG Bundles with User Impersonation When using `run_as_user` with DAG bundles, ensure: 1. All impersonated users and the Airflow user are in the same group 2. Configure appropriate umask settings 3. Set `dag_bundle_new_folder_permissions = 0o775` (default) 4. Set `dag_bundle_new_file_permissions = 0o664` (default) **Note:** This is a temporary solution. Future versions will handle multi-user access through supervisor-based bundle operations. ``` - [ ] Add the following in-code explanation for why the fallback is needed: ```python # Fallback needed for backward compatibility with old config files ``` -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
