[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-646?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15872696#comment-15872696
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on BEAM-646:
-------------------------------------

GitHub user tgroh opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/2039

    [BEAM-646] Use Surgery in the Dataflow Runner

    Be sure to do all of the following to help us incorporate your contribution
    quickly and easily:
    
     - [ ] Make sure the PR title is formatted like:
       `[BEAM-<Jira issue #>] Description of pull request`
     - [ ] Make sure tests pass via `mvn clean verify`. (Even better, enable
           Travis-CI on your fork and ensure the whole test matrix passes).
     - [ ] Replace `<Jira issue #>` in the title with the actual Jira issue
           number, if there is one.
     - [ ] If this contribution is large, please file an Apache
           [Individual Contributor License 
Agreement](https://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt).
    
    ---
    Couple of cleanups and underlying PRs still have to be submitted prior to 
actual review.
    
    I do want to use this PR to run some RunnableOnService Tests, though.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/tgroh/beam dataflow_runner_surgery

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/2039.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #2039
    
----
commit 02f01effdcf1a9a01dd1f0c6c94a3d025d16c064
Author: Thomas Groh <[email protected]>
Date:   2017-02-16T22:44:16Z

    Move Batch View Overrides out of DataflowRunner
    
    Although these are runner specific, they don't need to be in the runner
    shim class.

commit e344eaf70500c5594818b36df3047147ae0486d1
Author: Thomas Groh <[email protected]>
Date:   2017-02-16T22:58:52Z

    Move Streaming View Overrides out of the DataflowRunner
    
    These overrides are implementation details of the runner and
    runner-specific, but need not be within the Runner shim.

commit 71257024a18ccee8b881ae15be12145efefccd15
Author: Thomas Groh <[email protected]>
Date:   2017-02-17T03:14:23Z

    Add a Base OverrideFactory class for 1-to-1 overrides
    
    These overrides are relatively common, and this reduces the
    reimplementation of mapping singletons and casting them.

commit 46d6b1e12c9138516cd111b853bfb06fe545deab
Author: Thomas Groh <[email protected]>
Date:   2017-02-16T21:57:21Z

    Make Dataflow perform Surgery
    
    It's not Rocket Surgery, guys.

----


> Get runners out of the apply()
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-646
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-646
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: beam-model-runner-api, sdk-java-core
>            Reporter: Kenneth Knowles
>            Assignee: Thomas Groh
>              Labels: backwards-incompatible
>
> Right now, the runner intercepts calls to apply() and replaces transforms as 
> we go. This means that there is no "original" user graph. For portability and 
> misc architectural benefits, we would like to build the original graph first, 
> and have the runner override later.
> Some runners already work in this manner, but we could integrate it more 
> smoothly, with more validation, via some handy APIs on e.g. the Pipeline 
> object.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to