[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17301568#comment-17301568
 ] 

Berenguer Blasi commented on CASSANDRA-16516:
---------------------------------------------

I don't think it's a test failure/flakiness issue in the strict sense. Reading 
about [qt|https://github.com/quicktheories/QuickTheories#assumptions] it 
mentions qt's assumptions that pass less than 10% of the generated values will 
render that error.

Test used to fail quickly locally, now it passes 10K runs locally.

> ValueAccessorTest.testSlice is flaky
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-16516
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16516
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Test/unit
>            Reporter: Brandon Williams
>            Assignee: Berenguer Blasi
>            Priority: Normal
>             Fix For: 4.0-rc
>
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> https://ci-cassandra.apache.org/job/Cassandra-devbranch/479/testReport/junit/org.apache.cassandra.db.marshal/ValueAccessorTest/testSlice/
> Probably fairly rare, but the potential is there:
> {quote}
> Regression
> org.apache.cassandra.db.marshal.ValueAccessorTest.testSlice
> Failing for the past 1 build (Since In progress#479 )
> Took 25 ms.
> Error Message
> Gave up after finding only 59 example(s) matching the assumptions
> Stacktrace
> java.lang.IllegalStateException: Gave up after finding only 59 example(s) 
> matching the assumptions
> {quote}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to